Free Essays on History

The United States of America was founded as a country where â€Å"all men are created equal†. That famous line is something that should have been kept out of the Constitution for almost a hundred years. The issue of slavery prevented our country from being a place where all men are equal. During the colonial period, two economic systems were created and separated by free and slave labor. These differences would spark a series of future events that would create a chasm in the United States called sectionalism. Sectionalism divided our country through social, political, and economic differences. These differences would culminate during the 1850s and would eventually ignite a divided Congress and country to fight a war it had already won- the war for freedom. When our country’s Constitution was drafted, the writers considered slavery an issue. Our country was born for men to live in freedom, yet a large portion of its population was held in slavery. How could the United States call its self a republic where â€Å"all men are created equal†? After the Constitution was drafted, Northerners began protests to end slavery everywhere, but only succeeded in ending the slave trade in most states. The dividing of people on the issue of slavery turned into the sectionalism that fueled the Civil War. During the early stages of growth from the 17th to middle 18th century, two distinct economies developed in the United States. In the North, farming drove the economy. The same farming economy developed into a world of artisans, creating the middle class. The middle class represented almost 65% of the population of the North, until the start of the Industrial Revolution. The South’s economy revolved around the plantation. Plantation owners were wealthy, but few in numbers, yet they held the majority of the land in the south. Slave labor drove the plantations of the South. The differences between the regions were small and insignifi... Free Essays on history Free Essays on history 17. VE 18. YÃÅ"ZYILLARDA OSMANLI-SEFEVà  à Là ÃƒÅ¾Kà LERà Nà N Hà STOGRAFYASI Histografya olaylarà ½n bir kaydà ½ olduà °u kadar onlarà ½n sonucudur da, ve bu yà ¼zden ià §inden à §Ãƒ ½ktà ½Ãƒ °Ãƒ ½ durumlara zamanà ½n à ¾artlarà ½na gà ¶re farklà ½ tepkiler vermesi beklenebilir. Ãâ€"nyargà ½larà ½nda ve varsayà ½mlarà ½nda, attà ½Ãƒ °Ãƒ ½ kadar kapsadà ½Ãƒ °Ãƒ ½ konularda, dà ¼zensiz insan ilià ¾kilerinin bir yansà ½masà ½dà ½r, ve en az bilgi verdià °i zamanlarda bile baà ¾ka hià §bir aà §Ãƒ ½k ifadenin ikna edici bir à ¾ekilde vermeyeceà °i veriler saà °lar. Bu veriler de tarihi anlamamà ½zda tarihler ve olaylar kadar deà °erlidir. Bundan à §Ãƒ ½kan sonuà § à ¾udur: tek baà ¾Ãƒ ½na hià §bir tarihi yazà ½ onun edebi geleneà °ine ve karakterini veren bireysellià °ini veren farklà ½là ½Ãƒ °Ãƒ ½nà ½n tabiatà ½nà ½ ve derecesini bilmeden anlaà ¾Ãƒ ½lamaz. Çà ¼nkà ¼ histoà °rafyanà ½n herhangi bir à ¾ekilde taktiri onu edebi bir tarz olarak deà °erlendirmesi ve dià °er edebi dallar ià §indeki farkà ½nà ½n geleneksel gereà §lerinin kesintisiz bir devamlà ½là ½Ãƒ °a sahip olmasà ½ olduà °unu taktir etmek gerekir. Bu devamlà ½là ½k sayesinde gelià ¾imi à ¶là §Ãƒ ¼lebilir ve deà °ià ¾ik uluslarà ½n tarihi yazà ½larà ½nà ½n farklà ½ aà §Ãƒ ½larà ½ndan ele alà ½n! abiblir. Bà ¶yle olan her eser, detaylarà ½nda ne kadar yetersiz ve eksik olsa da, kendi baà ¾Ãƒ ½na à ¶zel bir à ¶neme sahiptir ve en iyi benzerleriyle karà ¾Ãƒ ½Ãƒ ¾Ãƒ ½klà ½ tamamlayà ½cà ½là ½klarà ½na bakarak ve detaylardan à §ok genel duruma bakarak anlaà ¾Ãƒ ½labilir. Bu ifade her ne kadar histografyanà ½n tamamà ½na uyulanabilecek genel bir prensip olsa da à ran ve Osmanlà ½ tarihi yazà ½larà ½ ià §in, ki neredeyse tamamà ½ à ¶zà ¼nde eà °lendirme amaà §là ½dà ½r, inkar edilemez bir geà §erlilià °i vardà ½r. Resim yapmayan ve heykel yapmayan bir toplum hikaye yaratmaz bu yà ¼zden à slamdaki halk ve aà ¾k hikayeleri, ganimet alà ½nmà ½Ãƒ ¾ ve insan à ¶zellikleri silinmià ¾ portreler ve heykeller gibi, ya à slam à ¶ncesi kà ¶klere dayanà ½r ya da dià °er toplumlardan alà ½nmà ½Ãƒ ¾tà ½r. Dià °er toplumlarda mit kà ¼ltà ¼rà ¼yle karà ¾Ãƒ ½lanan in... Free Essays on History American History Discuss the European motives for expansion and colonization in the New World. Then describe the different colonial transplantations that occurred in Virginia, Maryland, and Massachusetts Bay. What were the major sources of friction between the Indians and the English in Virginia and Massachusetts Bay? One of the main reasons for the Europeans to travel to the New World was the population growth in Europe. With a rise in property values also came the expansion of commerce. Farmers stopped growing crops and began to raise sheep, because of better profits; this made a lot of the works that worked the land for the farmers out of jobs. Lands usually saved for renters where given to the sheep for grassing areas. It leads the landlords to look for places of new and more products. The landlords needed to look for new trade routes to Asia. The New World was a land of new opportunities. Europeans could start with a new begin and place problems from the Old World behind them. Others were using the New World as an escape from the Roman Catholic Church and the corrupt practices of the Bishops. The New World allowed for practices of other religions without prosecution. The English settlers tried to recreate the English society, but ended up making a society combined with English and Native American ways of life. Virginia settlements like the other settlements of 1600s had many problems and disasters. To start, their choice of the wrong site, but with good intentions. The main choice was for defense against Native Americans and easy access by ships. But, the site they chose was low and swampy. Which led to an outbreak of malaria and was within territory of powerful local Natives. What was supposed to be a new life for the settlers turned out to be misery and most cases death. The area was surrounded by dense woods, which made for poor farming. The settlers wanted nothing to do with the local Natives. The London Company who had sp... Free Essays on History It was President Woodrow Wilson’s belief that "To conquer with arms is to make only a temporary conquest; to conquer the world by earning its esteem is to make permanent conquest." In Wilson's time, America wanted to focus on its domestic problems Democrats and Republicans alike. Wilson made every effort to keep the United States out of World War I. In 1914, he announced that the U.S. would not take sides in the war. In 1917, frustrated with his efforts to mediate a peace, Wilson becomes convinced that both sides needed to cease hostilities. Shortly after, he declared war, saying the world needed to be safe for democracy. A year later, he listed his goals for a war-free world, including a League of Nations and the Fourteen Points. In 1918, the Germans surrendered, expecting a peace treaty from Wilson’s Fourteen Points. Wilson sought to create a new world order after World War I that simply did not include war as a legitimate tool of foreign policy. The first five points called for an end to secret treaties between nations, demanded freedom of navigating the seas, equal trading practices and elimination of protective tariffs, reduction of armaments, and an end to imperialism. The next eight points advocated self-determination to national minorities in Europe, specifically the Poles and Slavs in the east of Europe. Most significant, however, was the final point, calling for a "general association of nations" that would make "mutual guarantees of independence and territorial integrity," to be known as the League of Nations. However, many believe that the peace treaty signed led to WWII, which involved President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Roosevelt was an advocator of neutrality acts designed to keep the United States out of another world war. Roosevelt did not share the isolationist sentiments that lay behind such legislation. But he hoped to avoid war. However, Germany's aggressiveness in 1939 forced Roosevelt to take a stronger po... Free Essays on History The United States of America was founded as a country where â€Å"all men are created equal†. That famous line is something that should have been kept out of the Constitution for almost a hundred years. The issue of slavery prevented our country from being a place where all men are equal. During the colonial period, two economic systems were created and separated by free and slave labor. These differences would spark a series of future events that would create a chasm in the United States called sectionalism. Sectionalism divided our country through social, political, and economic differences. These differences would culminate during the 1850s and would eventually ignite a divided Congress and country to fight a war it had already won- the war for freedom. When our country’s Constitution was drafted, the writers considered slavery an issue. Our country was born for men to live in freedom, yet a large portion of its population was held in slavery. How could the United States call its self a republic where â€Å"all men are created equal†? After the Constitution was drafted, Northerners began protests to end slavery everywhere, but only succeeded in ending the slave trade in most states. The dividing of people on the issue of slavery turned into the sectionalism that fueled the Civil War. During the early stages of growth from the 17th to middle 18th century, two distinct economies developed in the United States. In the North, farming drove the economy. The same farming economy developed into a world of artisans, creating the middle class. The middle class represented almost 65% of the population of the North, until the start of the Industrial Revolution. The South’s economy revolved around the plantation. Plantation owners were wealthy, but few in numbers, yet they held the majority of the land in the south. Slave labor drove the plantations of the South. The differences between the regions were small and insignifi... Free Essays on History The start of the modern science that we call "Computer Science" can be traced back to a long ago age where man still dwelled in caves or in the forest, and lived in groups for protection and survival from the harsher elements on the Earth. Many of these groups possessed some primitive form of animistic religion; they worshipped the sun, the moon, the trees, or sacred animals. Within the tribal group was one individual to whom fell the responsibility for the tribe's spiritual welfare. It was he or she who decided when to hold both the secret and public religious ceremonies, and interceded with the spirits on behalf of the tribe. In order to correctly hold the ceremonies to ensure good harvest in the fall and fertility in the spring, the shamans needed to be able to count the days or to track the seasons. From the shamanistic tradition, man developed the first primitive counting mechanisms counting notches on sticks or marks on walls. For over a thousand years after the Chinese invented the abacus, not much progress was made to automate counting and mathematics. The Greeks came up with numerous mathematical formulae and theorems, but all of the newly discovered math had to be worked out by hand. A mathematician was often a person who sat in the back room of an establishment with several others and they worked on the same problem. The redundant personnel working on the same problem were there to ensure the correctness of the answer. It could take weeks or months of labourious work by hand to verify the correctness of a proposed theorem. Most of the tables of integrals, logarithms, and trigonometric values were worked out this way, their accuracy unchecked until machines could generate the tables in far less time and with more accuracy than a team of humans could ever hope to achieve. By the late 1930s punched-card machine techniques had become so well established and reliable that Howard Aiken, in collaboration with engineers at ... Free Essays on History The north won the civil war for many reasons.There are many factors that lead to the north’s victory.I will begin by mentioning the compromise of 1850.After Lincoln won the election, himself and Black Republican Allies pressured the states of Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri and Delaware to remain in the union.Crittenden’s compromise restored the Missouri compromise line of 36/30 to California and guaranteed the national gov. would not bother with slave states that already existed.Anything north of this line was unconstitional.The territory was divided into the Nebraska and Kansas territories.The main issue was slavery.The free soil concept was the only thing that kept the American party and Republican party together.They were against the expansion of slavery.John Brown and 23 men of mixed color raided Harper’s Ferry to steal weapons and ammunition.The goal was for the blacks to kill the white slaveholders and families. Brown is captured and han gs himself.The Fall of Fort Sumter started started the civil war. The north had an overwhelming advantage in resources over the south.Northern white fighters outnumbered southern white fighters 3 to 1.The north had a bigger population because they believed in industrialization.The south believed in agriculture.The north dominated in the production of firearms (97%), railroads (96%), naval power, and better leadership.New technologies allowed them to develop a rifle musket that used minie balls that could fire up to 300 yards.General Winfield Scott gave Lincoln the idea to create a blockade on the south.It’s purpose was to cut the confederacy off from supply, putting political and economic pressure on them. At first, it was ineffective because of the massive size of the area they needed to cover (3,000 miles and almost 200 harbors to patrol).The union only had 42 ships. Winfield Scott creates a navy of 300,000 men to take over harbors and block off the south in a 3 year... Free Essays on History Although there had been a British and greater European presence in Africa prior to the last two decades of the 19th century it was primarily coastal and revolved around the slave trade. With the abolition of the slave trade within the British Empire in 1803 and a complete abolition of slavery across the empire in 1834 there was little interest in Africa by Britain until the end of the century. This lack of interest in Africa did not include The Cape Colony though, which the British gained at the end of the Napoleonic Wars and which served a key role in outfitting ships on the British trade route to India. The role and importance of Africa to the British soon changed though do to imperial competition with France and Germany. Germany under the aggressive policies of Bismarck set out to take a leading role in Africa and catch up to other European powers such as Britain and France in terms of empire by gaining new control over territory and expanding their spheres of influence. Other important factors made Africa the hot spot for British and European expansion including the discovery of gold in the Transvaal and diamonds in the Orange Free State, the palm oil industry in Nigeria, scientific discoveries such as the way to treat malaria, and the mapping and exploration of the previously mysterious African interior early in the 19th century. In order to explore the nature of British expansion in Africa Porter’s The Lion’s Share and T.O. Lloyds The British Empire 1558-1995 are indispensable texts. Using their information on British expansion throughout Africa as a foundation it becomes possible to break down the period of greatest growth between 1880 and 1900 by analyzing British role in Africa prior to 1880, the external roles that competitors such as Germany and France had in forcing England’s imperial hand coupled with the internal economic drives for procuring areas of Africa, and the special case and significance of the Cape Co...